I posted this piece (below: "A Fraud...") almost seven years ago. It remains highly relevant today. This situation is exactly why Presidential Debates in election years are rigged to the hilt. Blame the Republicrats, otherwise known as the Mega Corporation Party. It has two branches: the RINOs & the DINOs. 😀
.............................
"A Fraud...Upon the American People"
I remember well the days when the League of Women Voters, a totally nonpartisan group, was in charge of moderating Presidential Debates in this country. That was in the 1970's and 1980's. At the end of the League's stint, the Repubs & Dems rejected about 80 proposed questioners for the debate...as well as numerous tough questions. Later, the Republicrats came up with a nontransparent contract sanitizing the debate, saying who should be in the audience, and determining the exact questions that would be allowed. The League resigned with this statement: "A fraud is being perpetrated upon the American People.".
That's how we wound up with a private corporation run by the Dems & Repubs, the Commission on Presidential Debates, being in charge of the debates. The word "Commission" makes it sound as though it's some sort of public, representative, all-encompassing entity. It isn't...not by a long shot. This private company (funded by corporations & foundations) determines who is allowed to debate, who will moderate the event, what questions will be allowed, and who is allowed in the audience. This is rigging to the Nth degree.
At least the top three "Third Parties" should be allowed to participate in the upcoming debates...regardless of any percentage in polls. Why not? Isn't that democracy in action? If the Republicrats claim that there isn't enough time for that amount of participation, that's pure hogwash. Look at how many candidates were in the Primary Debates. Four, five, or even six candidates wouldn't hinder anything in the major Presidential Debates. Quite the opposite: such a scenario would enhance the choices for the electorate. The fact is: without being in those debates, a candidate has little to no chance to garner votes. That's how the Republicrat monopoly eliminates its competition.
[See the first featured segment on today's broadcast of Democracy Now, Thursday, August 18, 2016. Jill Stein, Gary Johnson, and others have something important to say.]
A private corporation should not be allowed to have complete control over those debates. That's not democracy...that's Soft Fascism.
Okay, you're all excited about politics. In this Rigged System I can't imagine why, but good for you. Now, why not insist that Oligarchical control be relinquished, and instead, genuine participatory democracy be instituted? Why not? Habit? Break out of the box.
Okay, you're all excited about politics. In this Rigged System I can't imagine why, but good for you. Now, why not insist that Oligarchical control be relinquished, and instead, genuine participatory democracy be instituted? Why not? Habit? Break out of the box.
...................
Not only my opinion. Be Well
